Hand powered Survival Device

(ME Design Project)

Key Design Requirements

  • Cost target: Less than $20 per unit for manufacturability and scalability
  • Form factor: Compact handheld design (~160 × 50 × 135 mm, <3 lb)
  • Ergonomics: Designed to fit 6.3–8.1 in hand sizes with non-slip grip
  • Power generation: 2–3.5 W output at ≤12 V using a brushless DC motor
  • Energy storage: 1000 mAh onboard storage
  • Mechanical transmission: 62:1 gearbox designed for ≥10,000 cycles
  • Reliability: Stainless steel gearing to reduce wear and corrosion

Design Process

  1. Role
    • Owned the design + verification of the curved gear rack, the primary element that transfers the handle squeeze force into the first drive gear and initiates motion in the gear system.
    • Performed hand calculations and SolidWorks FEA checks to validate strength, stability, fatigue life, and gear-tooth performance; coordinated interface requirements with the curved rack screw and drive gear.
  2. Component
    • Static: Curved Gear Rack — FS = 1.65
      • Verified bending-driven yielding risk at the fixed connection region under peak squeeze loading.
    • Buckling: Curved Gear Rack — FS = 26.42 (hand calc) , ~4.74 (SolidWorks buckling FEA)
      • Compared simplified-theory assumptions vs. curved-geometry FEA to bound stability margin.
    • Fatigue: Curved Gear Rack — FS = 1.09
      • Fatigue was a key driver; material selection was updated from Al 3003 to Al 5052 to improve factor of safety margin under cyclic squeezing.
  3. Connection
      1 / 2
      2 / 2
    • Static: Curved Rack Screw — FS = 9.78
      • Checked bolt loading under peak rack force to confirm large margin against static failure.
    • Fatigue: Curved Rack Screw — FS = 7.243
      • Verified repeated squeeze cycling does not drive fatigue failure of the fastening joint.
  4. Power Transmission
    • Teeth Bending: Curved Gear Rack — FS = 1.52
      • Validated gear-tooth bending strength under transmitted load into the mating drive gear.
    • Teeth Wear: Curved Gear Rack — FS = 18.93
      • Confirmed strong margin against contact-stress wear for long-term operation.
  5. Outcome
    • Established the curved gear rack as a validated, production-ready design candidate with verified safety factors across: static strength, buckling stability, fatigue, joint integrity, and gear-tooth loading.
    • Identified the lowest-margin modes (fatigue and tooth bending) early and used analysis + FEA to drive design/material decisions while maintaining healthy margins in buckling, wear, and fastening.
1 / 7
2 / 7
3 / 7
4 / 7
5 / 7
6 / 7
7 / 7

Where to find me

Boston, MA

Call Me At

Mobile: 1-508-367-9944